UGG AustraliaFounded1978Founder(s)Brian SmithHeadquarters, , U.S.Area servedWorldwideProducts, WebsiteUGG Australia (or simply UGG) is an American footwear company and is a division of the , .
UGG Australia footwear is manufactured in China. UGG is a registered trademark in the United States and over 100 other countries for their brand of and other footwear, as well as bags, clothing, outerwear and other goods. Deckers also owns registrations for their UGG Australia brand in various countries around the world. UGG Australia is headquartered in .
The UGG Australia brand is best known for its "Classic" sheepskin boots in the Australian , worn by both men and women. Sheepskin boots have been identified as a fashion trend for men and women since the early 2000s. The range has expanded to include not only footwear, but UGG brand bags, clothing, outerwear, hats, gloves and other goods. Deckers has reported sales of US$689 million under the UGG brand in 2008, an increase from US$14.5 million in 1995.
[] HistoryBy the mid-1970s, several surf shops in and the were selling Ugg boots purchased by the shops owners while visiting surfing events in Australia. Seeing the success of the boots in the U.S., in 1978, Australian surfer Brian Smith, then living in , and Doug Jensen applied to be the United States distributors for the Western Australian Ugg boot manufacturer, Country Leather. Family friends invested $20,000 into the new venture and the group set up Ugg Imports. In their first season in business, Ugg Imports sold 28 pairs of boots. Due to other business commitments, in 1979 Jenson handed over his share of the company to Smith. Sales steadily grew and Smith set up Ugg Holdings Inc. and in 1985 registered a US trademark on a rams head logo with the words "Original UGG Boot UGG Australia". In 1995, Deckers Outdoor acquired the business and continued to expand it. Sheepskin boots are now very popular worldwide.
[] Trademark controversyIn Australia and the United States, Deckers' rights in the UGG mark have been challenged, with differing outcomes. In 1971, Shane Steadman registered the trademark UGH-BOOT on the Australian Trade Mark Registry, and obtained an Australian registration for UGH in 1982. These registrations remained valid in Australia until removed for non-use in 2006. Steadman sold his UGH brand boots widely in Australia throughout the 1970s and 1980s.[] This registration was subsequently sold to Ugg Holdings in early 1995. In August 1995, Deckers Outdoor Corporation purchased Ugg Holdings Inc. and in 1999 registered Ugg Holdings trademarks, including the UGG AUSTRALIA label (with sun-like device), in the United States.
Bruce and Bronwyn McDougall, owners of , a Western Australia-based manufacturer, started legal action against the UGH-BOOTS registration in 2005. Specifically, they brought a non-use action against Deckers alleging that Deckers had not actively used the UGH-BOOT trademark in Australian commerce for the past three years. Their action was successful, and the UGH-BOOT registration was removed from the Australian Trademark Registry. In their reasons, the officer states:
The opponent has not demonstrated any use of the trade mark as registered, whether before, during, or after the period in question. In fact, read closely, Mr Kalinich’s sworn statement, above, appears to affirm that the opponent has not used the trade mark as registered.In a second non-use action between Deckers and Luda Production Pty, IP Australia confirmed that Deckers owned the trademark of their UGG AUSTRALIA label (with sun-like device), however the scope of the trademark was narrowed, restricted to just footwear. In their decision, the officer states:
I am satisfied that there has been genuine commercial use of the trade mark in relation to the following goods: footwear, including boots, shoes and clogs. Subject to any appeal from this decision, I direct that after 28 days from this decision, the trade mark registration be restricted to these goods.Finally, in 2010, IP Australian ruled on a dispute dating back to 2004. The decision rejected Deckers Outdoor Corporation Inc's objections, and granted Luda Production Pty Ltd the right to move to the registration phase of their UGG AUSTRALIA and MADE BY UGG AUSTRALIA labels and the phrase MADE BY UGG AUSTRALIA, subject to appeal. In their decision, the officer specifically refers to the phrase UGG AUSTRALIA:
The applicant [Luda Productions Pty Ltd] has attested to use of the words ‘UGG Australia’ in various forms over the years. None of the versions are particularly embellished, though some are accompanied by various descriptive additions. All the various versions provided as examples in the evidence of use fall into the category of substantially identical trade marks. All are clearly identified via the words ‘UGG Australia’. There is no other significant identifying feature in any of the applicant’s trade marks when in use. I am satisfied that the applicant has substantiated appropriate use for the provisions of subsection 44(4), and that it is thus appropriate to apply that subsection in the applicant’s favour.Deckers Outdoor Corporation holds registrations for the UGG trademark in the United States, China and the European Union and 100+[] other countries. The validity of the UGG trademark outside of Australia has also been challenged, but courts have consistently upheld its validity. In 2005, the validity of the UGG trademark was challenged in Federal Court in California; the court ruled for Deckers, stating that consumers in the United States consider UGG to be a brand name. A similar challenge was also rejected in the , where the court ruled that UGG is a well-known brand in the economic zone. In that case the court stated: "... the objection (to validity) will be stricken down. [Defendant's argument is] that Australian companies, such as Jumbo Ugg believe that the word UGG is a generic name. One cannot establish the fact that this is considered a generic name in Benelux based on the opinion of one or more companies in Australia. ... therefore, the legitimacy of the brand is upheld. The court has no reason to doubt that [UGG] is a well-known brand in Benelux."
Likewise,
Ugc Boot, the , which has been appointed by to resolve most Internet disputes, has used Deckers Outdoor Corporation ownership of the UGG trademark in the United States as part of its decision to direct Internet domains containing UGG to be transferred to Deckers.
[] CounterfeitingDuring a and case, a generic term defense was rejected by a Dutch court. La Cheapa distributed sheepskin boots on an Internet site from the Netherlands, describing them on its website as "100% authentic Ugg Australian boots!!!" with "UGG logo on the heel" in boxes virtually identical to Deckers packaging. Ruling in favor of Deckers with costs awarded against La Cheapa, the officer who heard the case stated it cannot establish as fact that "ugg" is considered a generic name in the , based on the opinion of one or more companies in Australia. The case is binding law throughout much of Western Europe under the Madrid Protocol.[]
Law enforcement officials in Great Britain, the U.S. and China have reported seizures of counterfeit 'UGG Australia' boots. Deckers continually monitors usage of the UGG trademark on the World Wide Web, taking action against auctions and websites that infringe its trademark. The Australian Trade Marks Office, IP Australia cautions:
"A trade mark registered under Australia's trade mark laws only provides rights for trade within Australia's borders. Trade mark laws are national laws and each country registers and protects trade marks within their own jurisdiction.""The Internet provides easy access to global markets and takes no account of national borders. If you are trading on the Internet you need to understand the laws of the country into which you are selling goods or services. If you place an offer for sale on the Internet in Australia that invites purchase from overseas, this can amount to trading overseas and could leave you vulnerable to legal action and expensive litigation. Likewise an overseas proprietor selling goods in Australia via the Internet may infringe an Australian trade mark."In response to counterfeits being sold on the Internet, people of various ages and nationalities have generated websites, blogs and videos on how to spot fake 'UGG Australia' boots.[]
[] Concern for animalsBeing one of many clothing products made from animal , the production of ugg boots has been the subject of criticism by the . In the decade beginning in 2000, the group called for the boycott of ugg boots and their replacement with alternatives not made from animal skin.
In 2007,
Cheap ugg boots uk, ,
Cheap ugg boots, realising that ugg boots were made of skin, wrote on her website: "I thought they were shaved kindly? People like to tell me all the time that I started that trend – yikes! Well let's start a new one – do NOT buy Uggs! Buy Stella McCartney or juicy boots." In February 2008, the Princeton Animal Welfare Society staged a campus protest against the fur industry, particularly attacking the ugg boot industry. "Students lay in the newly fallen snow on the Frist Campus Center's North Front Lawn on Friday afternoon, feigning death, wearing coats covered with fake blood and sporting signs that read, 'What if you were killed for your coat?' "
[] See also[] References[] External linksWikimedia Commons has media related to: